Re: pinhole Zero Factorial

From: CGDonahoe3@aol.com
Date: Sun Sep 12 1999 - 17:31:42 PDT

• Next message: Dan: "The block works for us... so far"
• Previous message: Erick Roldan: "Re: Pinhole Digest #236 - 09/11/99"
• Next in thread: ECaffer@aol.com: "Re: pinhole Zero Factorial"

From: CGDonahoe3@aol.com
Message-ID: <1b72be54.250d9fee@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 20:31:42 EDT
Subject: Re: pinhole Zero Factorial

thanks,

but convention violates calculation

will reflect upon the conventional wisdom

what is -1factorial??

cgd3

• Next message: Dan: "The block works for us... so far"
• Previous message: Erick Roldan: "Re: Pinhole Digest #236 - 09/11/99"
• Next in thread: ECaffer@aol.com: "Re: pinhole Zero Factorial"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 19 2000 - 11:09:28 PDT